Haha. Ha.
Just last week, I wrote (in a postscript to this entry):
The story has this lovely touch, too:
But I was wrong about one thing. We didn't even need to wait for the hearings! I'll work on my timing.
(Oh, yes, I will have quite a bit more on Hagel, following up on the earlier post. But I'll probably do the article(s) on Aaron Swartz's suicide first, and I'm finding those very difficult to write, in part for the reasons I've indicated. But the Swartz post(s) should be completed in the next several days.)
Hagel's confirmation hearings might provide a few moments of interest if someone dares to ask him what he thinks of Obama's Murder Program. If the past election is any guide -- when Obama's adoration of drones was mentioned only once to my knowledge, and then only so that everyone could agree how fantastically wonderful they are -- it won't even come up. But if it does, does anyone seriously think that Hagel will even question it in any meaningful manner, let alone denounce it as the monstrous evil that it is? Please. I expect most of Hagel's hearings to be devoted to fervent declarations of how specially special Israel is, how we should try diplomacy first with Iran -- but only diplomacy and talks on our terms, of course, and so long as our goals are fully realized, and if diplomacy doesn't result in everything that we want, well ... Oh, yes: there will also be many statements about how specially special all us queers are. And then: confirmation! Now you can skip the news for the next month.From today's news:
Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) announced his support Tuesday for the nomination of former senator Chuck Hagel as secretary of defense, delivering a key vote for the Nebraska Republican’s confirmation after weeks of voicing doubt about his positions on security issues related to Israel and Iran. ...Gee, those views really stand out from the foreign policy consensus.
“Senator Hagel could not have been more forthcoming and sincere,” Schumer said Tuesday in a statement. “Based on several key assurances provided by Senator Hagel, I am currently prepared to vote for his confirmation. I encourage my Senate colleagues who have shared my previous concerns to also support him.” ...
In a detailed statement, Schumer said Hagel left no doubt that he would support an aggressive posture toward Tehran.
“Senator Hagel rejected a strategy of containment and expressed the need to keep all options on the table in confronting that country. But he didn’t stop there,” Schumer said [and thank Christ for that!]. “In our conversation, Senator Hagel made a crystal-clear promise that he would do ‘whatever it takes’ to stop Tehran from obtaining nuclear weapons, including the use of military force. He said his ‘top priority’ as secretary of defense would be the planning of military contingencies related to Iran.”
Schumer said Hagel also pledged to continue supporting the delivery of F-35 Joint Strike Fighters to Israel and in general supported Israel’s right to a strong “qualitative military edge,” as its leaders like to assert.
The story has this lovely touch, too:
In his talks with Boxer and Schumer, Hagel expressed deep regret at his “Jewish lobby” remark years ago when referring to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC)."Very devastated." Aw, so touching. I'm moved. I am. God, you're so cynical.
“He was very devastated by it, looking back,” Boxer said.
But I was wrong about one thing. We didn't even need to wait for the hearings! I'll work on my timing.
(Oh, yes, I will have quite a bit more on Hagel, following up on the earlier post. But I'll probably do the article(s) on Aaron Swartz's suicide first, and I'm finding those very difficult to write, in part for the reasons I've indicated. But the Swartz post(s) should be completed in the next several days.)
<< Home